Host4Gain.com
  Article Directory
Search:

Home | Legal


Host4Gain.com Article Directory

The Person Who Was Murdered By Deceit and Perjury
By: D C Graham

The ABC Network had a trial last night on 20/20 about a man that was almost convicted of a crime he did not commit. It was a story that could have happened to anyone anywhere. It was a compelling story about how justice goes wide of the mark when one person decides to take one's destiny into their own hands. It the case last night, March 5, 2010, it was a Medical Examiner that had lied for over thirty years to get people convicted. No telling how many guiltless people this man sent to prison or death.
I, too, have a story that parallels that story but this innocent person was executed by the Commonwealth of Virginia. And, it only took them five years to do it. This was a conspiracy of a lot of people, judge, prosecutor, police and defense lawyers. It seems implausible, maybe impossible to you but it occured and I have the proof it happened. It is undeniable proof because it came from the mouths of the people that carried out this repulsive crime.
In Roanoke County Virginia in nineteen ninety-seven Earl Bramblett was put on trial for his life. It was a crime that took place in nineteen ninety-four. Four people were found dead, murdered, in a house that had been set on fire. The man, husband and father, Blain Hodges was found in bed upstairs in the house and he had been shot once in the head. His two daughters were found in another bedroom and both had been shot twice each in their heads. The wife and mother was discovered downstairs on a couch and she had been strangled and her body burned beyond recognition. The conflagration did little structural destruction to the house since all the windows and doors had been closed and the fire was starved from lack of oxygen.
The case was tried in the county seat of Salem, Virginia and heard by Judge Roy Willett. The Commonwealth Attorney of Roanoke County was F.W. (Skip) Burkart and his assistant Randy Leach. Two defense lawyers, appointed by Willett, were Mac Doubles and Terry Grimes.
Let's begin with the defense lawyers. These were two of the most inexperienced lawyers in the Roanoke Valley. Grimes was especially ineffective and well-known for losing trials that should have been easily won. Doubles, on the other hand, didn't have enough experience to have a reputation yet. During the trial it was apparent these two lawyers were scared by the gravity of the case and were ill prepared. They had wasted a year, while Bramblett was in the county jail, theoretically preparing for this trial. It was apparent they were incompetent, unprepared and scared.
The Commonwealth Attorney Burkart had prepared for the trial and had his "facts" laid out for the court case. These proof were in actuality all lies. The single thing that was a fact that he mentioned was the real crime and the victims. All else was made of whole cloth, lies, and easily proven so if Bramblett had had a genuine defense. He and Randy Leach had prepped a jail house snitch to perjure himself by claiming he had made notes of something Bramblett told him while in jail. That, too, was a lie. Bramblett had not told him anything he swore to in court. Opening and closing were packed with lies had anyone been listening closely.
Roy Willett, the judge in the case, sat and oversaw this one sided miscarriage of justice and intimidated the inexperienced lawyers while giving Burkart all he brought up as proof. A video made supposed to show the jury how a white truck turned in a "pinkish" red truck under illumination Burkart knew was inaccurate. Willett was supposed to see the trial was evenhanded, but he made sure it wouldn't be from the beginning by appointing these incompetent lawyers to represent Bramblett. Then he sat and listened while it was basically a trial from the prosecution side only. Nothing of substance was objected to.
The head investigator, State Police Investigator Barry Keesee, testified to conversations he had with Bramblett where no one other than he heard. He lied by omission by failing to tell the court he had visited Bramblett's place of employment the morning of the crime, then testified he thought it was a murder/suicide until that afternoon. He couldn't mention the visit because it would have blown the lie about the murder/suicide. His 'good ol' boy" attitude and down-home conduct made the lies well-suited for the jury.
So, Bramblett was found responsible, something that surprised no one, and was given the death penalty. Then the same incompetent Grimes "argued" his case before the Supreme Court of Virginia and, as usual, was denied a new (real) trial. His habeas attorney was Will Lindsey, whom most thought to be an effective lawyer, but for some incentive, he joined the cabal and threw Bramblett to the wolves, using the same lies presented in the trial. Lindsey had all the new facts but chose to sweep it under the rug. Bramblett was murdered in just over five years from his trial. This kind of fast track executions are reserved for the Oklahoma City bomber and the Washington, DC sniper.

Article Source: http://www.host4gain.com/articles

Submit your article to hundreds of sites

allamosa.com allamosa.com/thenewnazis.html allamosa.com/absolutefacts.html

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Legal Articles Via RSS!
Additional Articles From - Home | Legal
Sign Up for a free account or learn more.
Submit Articles
Member Login
Top Authors
Most Popular Articles
Submission Guidelines
Ezine Notifications
Article RSS Feeds

Unique Article Wizard - Join Now!

Are you smart enough to make money online? You could be...

Click here to get your FREE copy of "Dotcomology - The Science of Making Money Online" TODAY!

Link to Us
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service

Powered by Article Dashboard